Lawyer Responds: John Oliver SLAPPs Back? (Real Law Review)

  • Published on Nov 16, 2019
  • John Oliver was sued by Bob Murrary for defamation. Was it really a meritless suit or is there more to the story? If you’re in the market for a great suit, I can’t recommend Indochino highly enough and Legal Eagles get a discount!
    Summary from Vulture:
    Remember back in 2017 when John Oliver did a Last Week Tonight segment about coal company CEO and “geriatric Dr. Evil” Bob Murray, then - as predicted - was sued by Bob Murray the following week? Oliver couldn’t discuss the lawsuit while it was ongoing, but we did get an update when the case was dismissed in February 2018, when Oliver, referencing the original segment, told Murray to “eat shit.” What you might not know, however, is that Murray appealed the case after it was dismissed, so Oliver was yet again forced into silence until the case was recently dropped. Which brings us to last night’s Last Week Tonight, when Oliver was finally free to recap the entire saga … and, in doing so, to start a whole new saga too.
    (Thanks to Indochino for sponsoring this video)

    Welcome to Real Law Review by LegalEagle; a series where I try to tackle the most important legal issues of the day. If you have suggestion for the next topic leave your comment below.
    And if you disagree, be sure to leave your comment in the form of an OBJECTION!
    Remember to make your comments Stella-appropriate. Stella is the LegalBeagle and she wields the gavel of justice. DO NOT MESS WITH STELLA.
    ★More series on LegalEagle★
    Real Lawyer Reacts:
    Laws Broken:
    Law 101:
    Real Law Review:
    All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
    Typical legal disclaimer from a lawyer (occupational hazard): This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should conta ct your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos!

    ★ Tweet me @legaleagleDJ legaleagleDJ
    ★ More vids on Facebook: ➜ legaleaglereacts
    ★ Stella’s Insta: stellathelegalbeagle
    ★ For promotional inquiries please reach out here:

Comments • 4 497

  • LegalEagle
    LegalEagle  21 day ago +601

    🤔Do you agree?
    👔If you’re looking for a great suit Indochino will make you a fully custom slim fit suit for only $359

    • Echoeversky Ü
      Echoeversky Ü 3 days ago

      NotALawyer: given the constitutional nature of free speech, national anti-slapp laws are warranted.

    • Dewayne Thomas
      Dewayne Thomas 6 days ago

      @LilleTotte It has been since it's birth I believe.

    • Dewayne Thomas
      Dewayne Thomas 7 days ago

      @LilleTotte OJ Simpson walked, plenty of em do.

    • LilleTotte
      LilleTotte 7 days ago

      So the American judicial system is Pay-to-Win?

    • Dewayne Thomas
      Dewayne Thomas 7 days ago

      @aspookyfox the fuckin mining dude that killed everyone?

  • ZhangtheGreat
    ZhangtheGreat 8 hours ago

    Bob Murray killed Mufasa, wished himself into a genie to conquer Agrabah, and set off an eternal winter in Arendelle #EatShitBob

  • SomeoneCommenting
    SomeoneCommenting 11 hours ago

    The American justice system was made by the rich for the rich. The laws will always give advantage to the rich over the poor, and this is a good example of that. Just go through all legislators and try to find how many are *not* rich, or friends of the rich who pay for their campaigns. It is a very very small group. The rest are all rich guys. These days you can't even think about running for president unless you are rich or have billionaires backing you up in campaign. You have seen in the news how primary candidates get out of the run simply because they cannot make the numbers, no matter if the guy had the best ideas and was the most decent candidate. This country runs on money, and the legal system is no exception.

  • Pedro Hernandez
    Pedro Hernandez 12 hours ago

    Bob Murray? isn't that the fat guy that convinced the Russians to rig the US election in 2016?

  • Grinning Goat
    Grinning Goat 18 hours ago

    Doesn't it feel weird that the show uses both a factual tone to report the news side by side with comedy? I know I'm being a bit of devil's advocate here, but switch from joke to news to joke to news, it seems like an invitation to cross the line. It present a statement and add ridicule for it, conditioning a response as you watch it. My point is that having a comedy routine side by side with a journalistic report seems like a way to get away that journalistic approach might not be able too.

  • P Schmied
    P Schmied 22 hours ago

    Indo-Chino = Indochina = Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam

  • P Schmied
    P Schmied 22 hours ago

    The judicial system is NOT " effectively a branch of the government" 6:42 It IS a branch of the government. It's a bad lawyer who doesn't "say what you mean, mean what you say".

  • Prjndigo
    Prjndigo Day ago

    A court that accepts a lawsuit and allows service without any evidence is in violation of the Rule of Law and subject to RICO. No questions asked, allowing the filing of a lawsuit without evidence results in court fees, profit.

    Remember to also cite the COURT in your anti-SLAPP as a hostile party. Allowing a filed suit without any evidence is equivalent to unreasonable search and seizure. It is an impediment to the **victim's** time, standing and income and is slander in and of itself.

    CECI CEO Day ago


  • Shamus H
    Shamus H Day ago

    Bob Murray? You mean the Zodiac Killer?

  • richard lawton
    richard lawton Day ago

    The plaintiffs on winning in the UK do not always get their legal fee's paid for when the win a case plenty end up being landing in huge debts or out of pocket fighting court cases. It is not an automatic some will get the full costs some get nothing at all and some may get a partial sum for the legal troubles.

  • Erik Olsen
    Erik Olsen Day ago

    Note that Mr. Nutterbutter isn't just "a staff member". That's Noel MacNeal, the in-house puppeteer at Last Week Tonight. He started on The Great Space Coaster, has performed in several Henson productions, and is probably best known as Bear from Bear in the Big Blue House.

  • hannahalice
    hannahalice 2 days ago

    It speaks volumes to note that the UK law doesn't have any form of anti-SLAPP legislation and not even the concept for a need for it. But I would go even further that the USA needs a "plaintiff pays" in criminal cases where the police "overcharge" in order to punish by layer fees or gain an advantage to force plea bargaining

  • Angel Dust The Porn Star

    To quote bob murray, or rather to absolutely mock and face desk him:
    "Welcome to the coal plant, it's a dangerous place. Thank you for investing. Go there for your router, there for your orders, we'll pollute the world to fill up our quotas. If you get injured, there'll even be fees at your funeral for your mourners. Prosperity wasted on worthless humans, they're just fuel to the fire for our endorsements. Honestly, did you not read the coal plants policy on workplace misdemeanors and injuries, that defines you illegally as coal company policy? I've got you in lock and key, no honesty needed when you've already bleeded against the bladed bleachers. Were you expecting human rights? Were you expecting a raise? Were you hoping the death toll would be low? Ha! No at all! My friend you're indentured, just like a roll of a slot machine; you'll work, to earn the right to work, to earn the right to work more, just so you can eventually die. $ $ $ Dollars in stacks higher than the twin towers, oh come now, you're just an oiled up gear for the machine, if you feared for your life, you should of read the fine print, cause now you're in deep debt, bet you regret it, no way to forget it, but let me assure you you're now set to work for life as I make a public announcement PR lie, defamation? Makes more famous if it's all in good inflation, country rode, west Virginia, Alabama, sorry, did I sue and ban ya? They save 'save the trees', but who will pay for your funeral fees? I'll make a deal if you'll make an appeal, removal is for your approval, I'm just here for the top dollar, making money off your shoulder, who knew such a tycoon could cause a monsoon? Guess we'll see soon in episode 2..."

  • Sidney Robinson
    Sidney Robinson 2 days ago

    im on John Olivers side sorry.

  • Jon Brewer
    Jon Brewer 2 days ago +1

    I appreciate your precise use of the English language, thank you for the info.

  • Boba0514
    Boba0514 2 days ago

    Pretty sure you have only worn tailor-made suits if you're actually a lawyer, but 400 really is pretty good

  • Lisa Hall
    Lisa Hall 2 days ago

    Bob Murray? Isn't he the guy who took radioactive waste from Rocky Flats and dumped it into the Denver water supply via the Lowry Landfill Superfund Site?

  • Alan Filoteo
    Alan Filoteo 2 days ago

    whoever you paid to light your setup 👏

  • BunzeeBear
    BunzeeBear 2 days ago

    I got bored after 2 minutes of SLAP AND ANTI SLAP as there was no PUNCHING OR KICKING IN THE BALLS.

  • Jgburch
    Jgburch 2 days ago

    What is the legal definition of a public figure? Would the head of the local Garden Club who is interviewed by a reporter be a public figure. What is that Garden Club president takes to the street to actively protest legislation dealing with gardening?

  • Wondering IN NY
    Wondering IN NY 2 days ago

    Didn't John Oliver cover this?

  • SatinSplash
    SatinSplash 3 days ago +1

    The only SLAPP I like is on a bass 😤

  • Victor Leal
    Victor Leal 3 days ago

    That plug in the end was brilliant.

  • Marc H
    Marc H 3 days ago

    Finally, and no shill here, the ONE thing I can agree with is the indochino shill. He looks great, and do love a tie tack!

  • Marc H
    Marc H 3 days ago

    Annnd first and foremost, this is why the 1st, 4th, and 5th amendments are basically ANY citizens best friends. Why I might drill down into JO's citizenship. He DOES have it right... Fair comment, etc. basically shields us Americans from a TON of LEGITIMATE legal lawsuits. Of course, this doesn't mean that someone can't just drag you into court, willy nilly, for NO reason whatsoever, and like we BOTH said in this video, why it's incredibly important that there should be LOSER PAYS system.

  • Marc H
    Marc H 3 days ago

    btw "actual malice" is not misleading, it's a fulcrum of NY Times V. Sullivan, and it IS actually kinda a BIG deal! eyeroll "lawyer." eyeroll.

  • Marc H
    Marc H 3 days ago

    Frankly at 15:50 the lawyer would do HIMSELF some justice by citing NY Times v. Sullivan etc. Before it even gets there. Do yourself a favor! Eyeroll! And certainly JO was outside of the system in doing so.... I'm just saying, and JO actually didn't either. If you're gonna go first amendment in proving your're in the right, might as well go ALL the way in showing the public just how much RIGHT you are! Oh, and btw I hate JO, and everything he stands for, and yet I LOVE the Constitution of the USA!

  • Marc H
    Marc H 3 days ago

    And BTW... AS you've done in the past don't say that Trump, etc. was on the hook for the legal fees. IT WAS THOSE WHO WERE BACKING STORMY TO COME AGAINST HIM IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!! TELL THE TRUTH!!!! FAKE NEWS!!!! FAKE NEWS!!!!

  • Marc H
    Marc H 3 days ago

    And, frankly, he's correct in the so called SLAPP lawsuits. I brought it up that the State was bringing a case against my 1st, fourth, and poententially 5th amendment rights, and they DID have to call a supervisor to the scene, and this evidence was brought up in court. While I ultimately lost on the amendment accusations, they DID have to prove that it was NOT in a violation to my rights. Bottom line is KNOW, and EXERCISE your rights people!!!!

  • Marc H
    Marc H 3 days ago

    Soooo SLAP suit = filing against Mike Bloomberg for claiming he actually did ANYTHING in NYC after 9/11. Or, against you for letting your tie flop around, because you have a tie tack. Frankly, I LOVE the latter. Thanks for doing that! But, nevertheless, I'm filing suit against you for wearing WAY too much hair gel in a video!

  • Marc H
    Marc H 3 days ago

    Annnnd. I DO absolutely agree with the "loser pays" system. Should be no matter what. Should always be. Would eliminate SOOOOOO Many frivilous lawsuits, it wouldn't even be funny!

  • Chet McGovern
    Chet McGovern 3 days ago

    That was a slick plug for Indochino

  • Matt Greising
    Matt Greising 3 days ago

    Thank you for making the obscure workings of the legal system comprehensible. You seem to lean towards common sense. I will be watching you in the futurel

  • Christopher Bolanos
    Christopher Bolanos 3 days ago

    was Bob Murray the guy who invented Cancer

  • Thomas Broom
    Thomas Broom 3 days ago

    The real question is what if I want a fat cut suit?

  • Milo S
    Milo S 3 days ago

    Bob Murray? Isn't that the guy who sprayed revenge porn on a holocaust memorial?

  • wannabeneko
    wannabeneko 3 days ago +2

    Davie504: *I feel a disturbance in the force*

  • BlueBird858
    BlueBird858 3 days ago +3

    Bob Murray? That’s the guy who wishes dishonor on my and my cow!

  • T Mos
    T Mos 4 days ago

    I only subscribe to 3 or 4 channels. Congrats to making the list, love yours.

  • James Bell
    James Bell 4 days ago

    Not gonna lie ... That was the best JOHN OLIVER ... EVER !!! The story about the kidney stone killed me !!! That Mr. Bob Murray seems like a nice fellow. Bawhahahahaha !!!

  • Daniel Carpenter
    Daniel Carpenter 4 days ago

    But is it actually a bad idea to say that one of your prospective judges calls his penis "The Gavel"?

  • Gavin S.
    Gavin S. 4 days ago

    Bob Murray! Isn’t that the guy that burned down the Library of Alexandria?

  • Will Lewis
    Will Lewis 4 days ago

    Classifying John Oliver and HBO's victory as "pyrrhic" is only true from a purely financial standpoint. I'm sure HBO would also take into account the defense of their reputation and the ongoing notice to the world at large that they won't be pushed around, not to mention the publicity it generated. Not all of the cost benefit analysis in defending Oliver and the show is purely the cost of the suit.

    CIRZETT 4 days ago

    that was one helluva commercial dude..

  • atomant451
    atomant451 4 days ago

    Shouldn't the Plaintiff have all of the evidence before filing suit? The Plaintiff could sue for no other reason than to have the Defendant tied up in a Court room knowing that all the time they are there, it's costing the Defendant money through time away from work, or Business.
    So my question is, why can't the Court proceed right away?
    and let the Plaintiff justify his cause, then and there?

    • atomant451
      atomant451 4 days ago

      I think the Legal Eagles know keeping their client tied up in Court is a win, win for both Attorneys.

  • The Wiener Dog Vlogs

    Wait, i thought that you couldnt sue someone for the same thing twice?

  • partlycurrent
    partlycurrent 5 days ago +1

    The american way of paying for trial costs is just another example of how in Europe there are better protection laws for individuals.
    The american law obviously benefits rich people and discriminates against the poor, no wonder that that rule doesn't change and is still in place maybe hundreds of years after it was passed

  • Janusha
    Janusha 5 days ago

    As AMAZINGLY cowboy amateurish and backwards as the US legal & justice system is... Its oddly weird to see somebody defending it.

  • Gary McMichael
    Gary McMichael 5 days ago

    Didn't this goofball "legal eagle" once post all his videos titled with "REAL Lawyer......(blah blah blah)"? Apparently he's no longer a "real" lawyer.

  • stackpolian
    stackpolian 5 days ago +2

    there is a big SLAAP case going on in Texas right now, dont know if you've heard of it Vic Mignogna v. Funimation/Jamie Markie/Ron Toye & Monica Rial

  • Adrain Acha
    Adrain Acha 6 days ago

    Bob Eat Shit !!!

  • Tattooed Munky
    Tattooed Munky 6 days ago

    Objection, the show is titled "Last week tonight with John Oliver" , not a talk show like Montell or Murray Povich!

  • phithakphong ruanai
    phithakphong ruanai 6 days ago

    Need a lawyer..There is a problem with the bank in Thailand.

  • Just Aguy
    Just Aguy 6 days ago

    Well there WAS no evidence of an "earthquake" the seismic records are clear on that. Requiring that the defendant gather that information although it was obviously publicly available at that point due to reporting, and why wouldn't he file a libel suit IF there was false reporting?

  • Thomas Knapp
    Thomas Knapp 6 days ago +3

    Yeah, I remember Bob Murray. I watched that dude assassinate John Kennedy the night before the motorcade in Dallas.

  • Kevin M
    Kevin M 6 days ago

    Making John Oliver one of the most reprehensible jerks on television. Put yourselves in Murray's place. Would any of you sit idly while Oliver and HBO make unproven accusations of wrongdoing against you that resulted in injury to others?

  • Gavin
    Gavin 6 days ago

    Isn’t Bob Murray the guy that shit in Mister Rodgers mouth?

  • Remy Thomassen
    Remy Thomassen 6 days ago

    What? Slap on a cheap suit!?!

  • Josny13
    Josny13 6 days ago

    18:12 Oi, mister lawyer, get your facts together, it was barely one fifth! xD 18:22 Gross overstatement. One fifth of a 26m video is barely half of 10 minutes.
    I'm sorry for expecting standards on a video titled: "Lawyer responds" when this lawyer acts more like a politician, overstating things to win votes.
    Granted, that part of the video made so much more impact, it might as well have been the last third, that's how much it overshadows the rest, but come on! 1/3 is not 1/5 and 5 minutes (, that is if you count the 1 minute long end credits, ) is not 10 minutes, fyi. xD

    Even more disgusting sellout at the end, and in your own pinned comment under your own video, this is the first and last video I watch from you, good day sir. *tips hat*