Boeing 777 - the best airliner of the XX century. History and description

Share
Embed
  • Published on Jul 4, 2018
  • Boeing 777 - a family of wide-body long-haul airliners, developed by Boeing in the 1990s. Triple sevens are the proud owners of the title of the largest twin-engine aircraft in the world.
    Thanks for watching!
    Please like, comment and subscribe!
    Our Facebook: facebook.com/skyshipscom/
  • Autos & VehiclesAutos & Vehicles

Comments • 889

  • The Greenman
    The Greenman 8 hours ago

    You're voice sounds like my SERE School (soft cell interrogator) instructor from Maine in 1993.

  • taketimeout2
    taketimeout2 2 days ago

    The 777 programme was when Boeing seemed to be a straightforward friendly and honest company. We believed in it because the people involved in its design and production programme seemed genuinely enthusiastic and believed they were making the best thing since sliced bread. And they were, and we believed them because we LIKED what we saw at Boeing.
    At the time Flight Sims were booming and aviation seemed to be blossoming in every way. It was a great time to be around aircraft. I want those times back.

  • benzproducts
    benzproducts 3 days ago

    It's a real downgrade compared to the 747 or A380. They call this progress?

  • gsmd770
    gsmd770 4 days ago

    I love the 777!!! I've had the pleasure of flying on her often!

  • Law of the UniVerSe
    Law of the UniVerSe 4 days ago +3

    I recently flew on a 777 from Toronto to Manila then back again a couple of weeks later...16 1/2 hours in the air non-stop... My oh My... Enough Said...

    • Joshua Burdette
      Joshua Burdette Day ago

      Law of the UniVerSe I recently flew to Manila too on a 777-300ER. Mine was from JFK though and I connected in Hong Kong. I initially dreaded a 16 hour flight but once on board and settled in to my seat it wasn’t bad at all. Cathay Pacific is a wonderful airline.

  • David Richards
    David Richards 5 days ago

    I love how you include the specifications of the aircraft.

  • Joseph Falsetta
    Joseph Falsetta 7 days ago

    can't someone who speaks English narrate?

  • White Boy
    White Boy 7 days ago

    Still amazes me how us humans built skyscrapers that fly through the sky.

  • Jesteria78
    Jesteria78 8 days ago

    This is such an ugly looking plane.

  • Iamdonald duck
    Iamdonald duck 8 days ago

    777 the best plane ! ? ...er hmm ..except that one that crashed mysteriously in the Indian ocean

  • chikara
    chikara 8 days ago

    11:01 daddy of the sky is following

  • Sabuj Pattanayek
    Sabuj Pattanayek 11 days ago

    A380 is much smoother, can't even feel that plane take off

    • EJK k
      EJK k 11 days ago

      It's also MUCH heavier.. heavier aircraft are generally smoother with less turbulence. Also you forget that well trained pilots make all the difference in the world. A great pilot will make a 737 or A320 take off smoother than a novice pilot in an A380. You can't compare Apples to Oranges.

  • Cronoviajero
    Cronoviajero 12 days ago +5

    The best airliner of the XX century is the 747. Period.

    • Jimmy Gee
      Jimmy Gee 10 days ago +2

      Cronoviajero yeah she’s the undisputed queen. But the MD-11 and L-1011 shouldn’t be discounted either. Two great planes introduced at the wrong times (I specified MD-11 over DC-10 on purpose)

  • Abstraz
    Abstraz 16 days ago

    I love the 767 and 777

  • Jimmy Gee
    Jimmy Gee 16 days ago +2

    Beautiful? Design wise a generic twin engine aircraft. I mean it’s a technological marvel but beautiful? Na

    • dredeth
      dredeth 14 hours ago

      +Jimmy Gee beauty of choices is that I think the opposite. To me those, what you call generic are the actual beauties , simple looking. Without too many unnecessary shapes added. Never liked that 747 bump or a tiny cabin shifted above the longitudinal axis or a weirdly placed engines that some of triplets had. L1011 looks like is having a cancer on a vertical stabilizer for example.
      When it comes to an aviation design the simplicity is what creates the beauty for some of us, that's why we find 777 the most beautiful.

    • Jimmy Gee
      Jimmy Gee 19 hours ago

      dredeth L-1011 is probably the most beautiful aircraft ever made. The DC-9/MD-80/MD-90/717 is still flying and it absolutely gorgeous. You still see the DC-10/MD-11, also gorgeous. 727 gorgeous, 747 gorgeous. The current plane design while most efficient is all pretty generic these days. The 787 probably takes the cake when it comes to slightly better than generic twin engine aircraft design. The CS/A220 family is also up there. Outside of size the 777 isn’t anything special aesthetically

    • dredeth
      dredeth Day ago

      Can you please tell us which one isn't generic and which is the most beautiful then?

  • Tom Seeberg
    Tom Seeberg 17 days ago

    Absolutely a masterpiece the triple sevens, but the market is probably not ready for much more of them. Boeing has produced 1600 pieces of them through the yrs and it is a lot of them flying. It has been a sucsess all together, but they will phase out the 300ERs now and focusing on the 777X models. But the thing is that the orderbook is definitely not full and there is only a few companies that has ordered them. So I think it will not be produced so much of them the next decade and Boeing will focuse more on the 787-8-9-10s. I,ve heard that the first 777-300ERs has done their job and has ended up in a scrapyard now. The came around in 2003 with Air France. So I don,t think many companies will still be stuck with aircrafts that is two decades old today. It is also a moment where Boeing has to think in a new way of building aircrafts and wich of them can they still produce.

  • FavoriteBen67 _
    FavoriteBen67 _ 17 days ago

    747 isn’t the largest plane in the world 😂

  • michael saayman
    michael saayman 19 days ago

    Lets hope its safe to fly unlike 737 and 787

  • U.S. PATRIOT
    U.S. PATRIOT 19 days ago

    If I owned an airline, I'd have Boeing, Airbus and Embraer compete against each other providing my airline a fuel efficient super wide body TRI-JET, to include increases viewing via more windows throughout. No cramped seating allowed!

  • U.S. PATRIOT
    U.S. PATRIOT 19 days ago

    Any true fan of aviation, must truly appreciate and respect all that the Boeing 777 represents, regardless if you are a fan of Boeing Aircaft or not. I am a Boeing fan myself, but do give credit to Airbus when it is due. My personal favorite Airbus, is the A340. Happy/Safe Flying!

  • U.S. PATRIOT
    U.S. PATRIOT 19 days ago +1

    Observing every line of the Boeing 777 in person, is truly a great way to really get it/appreciate the engineering, design and marvel that it is. Great video presentation here.

  • arceo coronel
    arceo coronel 20 days ago

    B-777, Well Designed Modern A/C by Boeing as well as the old Boeing 757 aircraft.

  • chao wei
    chao wei 21 day ago

    It is too early to call it as the best. Time after time, we will see.

    • U.S. PATRIOT
      U.S. PATRIOT 19 days ago

      How long must the 777 be doing great before you decide?

  • Lance Tay
    Lance Tay 21 day ago

    excellent, boeing should hire you to make a 777 legacy video

  • Shivati Starr
    Shivati Starr 21 day ago

    Also what I learned from those disasters is that this plane actually SURVIVES bad landings well. Three bad accidents.... One where the plane flipped around and people lived!!! That's amazing!

  • Shivati Starr
    Shivati Starr 21 day ago

    I'm curious how the tests and for etops (spelling atops?) Happened. Like how did that done FOR SURE that a plane could go with only one engine? I know they don't test failures because that's too dangerous, but I also know that planes since then have been fine when emergencies happened. So how did they actually make this decision definitively?

  • BlackArrow
    BlackArrow 22 days ago

    *_"the best airliner of the XX century."_*
    No, that's just your opinion.

    • A. J.
      A. J. 21 day ago

      Well, yeah. Hence the video. His opinion.

  • JohninsoTexas
    JohninsoTexas 27 days ago

    I DON'T TRUST BOEING, THEY ACCEPT INFERIOR PARTS FROM SUB-CONTRACTORS TO SAVE MONEY.....

  • FeFe
    FeFe 28 days ago +6

    Can't waits for the 777x first flight. Been on reveal on March 13, hope to be on on field for the first flight.

  • Richie Kock
    Richie Kock 29 days ago

    i book flights so that i fly with B777'S

  • Jasmine Jeanine
    Jasmine Jeanine Month ago +2

    I always love to see ppls responses to the 777 as it makes me SO proud of my dad as my dad designed part of the 777. He dealt with their radar systems/radar dome, GPS, antennas, and communication systems. Of course like normal most of these were originally created for the US military and then modified for civilian markets.

  • davidca96
    davidca96 Month ago

    777 is my favorite passenger plane still flying. The 747 was the best ever made, but sadly doesnt carry people anymore.

    • Aaron Staas
      Aaron Staas Month ago

      what do you mean? there are plenty of 747s still carrying passengers

  • Maxwell Coffee Simth

    The emerits plane the polit hit the ground hard which broke the right gear and titled on the right engine.

  • Maxwell Coffee Simth

    2 of the asana plane crash died from other injuries a fire truck drove over them they were sisters.

  • Arun Seigell
    Arun Seigell Month ago +1

    The seating is as comfortable as the cattle cars taking jews to belsen for gassing

  • Bjarne Pedersen
    Bjarne Pedersen Month ago +2

    The Caravelle from France could fly 1000 meter without sinking more than 1 meter with motors turned off. Todays planes will fall like a stone.

    • Michael Seibert
      Michael Seibert Day ago

      Bjarne Pedersen where did you read that? A modern glider will be able to glide 50 to 70 m for every meter in height loss. There is no way an airliner will be able sustain 1000 to 1. 😅

  • Bjarne Pedersen
    Bjarne Pedersen Month ago

    How far can it fly without motors is defining a good aeroplane.

  • Glen M. Danielsen
    Glen M. Danielsen Month ago +1

    These videos are just outstanding! Narrator is absolutely excellent!

  • Vslsnks
    Vslsnks Month ago

    Back when Boeing was a plane-maker and not a Fortune-500 company. And this coming from a proud European and Airbus fan.

  • Lernz
    Lernz Month ago

    eh Im going on this plane in the summer

  • ณภัทร สุขแสง

    Not in the same class as the A350. Most airlines cram 10 seats across in a fusilage designed for 9 making it very cramped and claustrophobic. I make a point now never to fly economy in this aircraft.

  • Nemon Bettshaft
    Nemon Bettshaft Month ago +1

    Don’t use air operators that use Boeing

  • zululeppard
    zululeppard Month ago +1

    Thank you for another high content video

  • Anurag aggarwal
    Anurag aggarwal Month ago

    777 is very impressive.

  • zokonjazokonja
    zokonjazokonja Month ago +2

    After last event with 737MAX and after watching tvclip.biz/video/UqIzcuNpXP0/video.html
    I decided that I will not step in in any Boeing version introduced after 2010. This includes also this 777-8 and ongoing 777-9.
    Concerning me, they are dead.

  • Todd Dembsky
    Todd Dembsky Month ago

    I love your style and presentations. Excellent content.

  • Will James
    Will James Month ago

    What's up with the Robot voice....?

  • Rodolfo Ayala
    Rodolfo Ayala Month ago

    Great 👍 video.

  • Sunil Fernando
    Sunil Fernando Month ago

    Interesting video. Boeing 777. Work Horse in the Sky.

  • Martin Atanasov
    Martin Atanasov Month ago +1

    It is NOT the best airliner of 20th century. The A380 is!

  • Jumor Jetseter
    Jumor Jetseter Month ago

    Computerized Machining has been used in making Air Bus planes already so long ago that Boeing desperately tried to catch up and repetedlly failed trying to make B-737 Ng , by the time they almost got it almost right their experiment with computer - pilot interactions in B-737 MAX 8 ended in disasters and international disappointment.

  • Janis Gyr
    Janis Gyr Month ago

    I Love the wings😍

  • abadiqaisy123
    abadiqaisy123 Month ago

    For the man speaking in the video: Russians your planes are best!

  • GooglR Ratings
    GooglR Ratings Month ago +3

    Switching focus from 737Max to 777 may be the best thing for Boeing at the moment.

    • Asim Alharbi
      Asim Alharbi Month ago

      +Nemon Bettshaft good luck

    • Nemon Bettshaft
      Nemon Bettshaft Month ago

      Asim Alharbi well that depends on your views on fate, I personally like to think I have some control over my fate, not flying in Boeing is one act of control

    • Asim Alharbi
      Asim Alharbi Month ago

      +Nemon Bettshaft you'll not escape your destiny. Your end is written before you exsisted. So, do anything and the end is comming wherever and whenever you are

    • Nemon Bettshaft
      Nemon Bettshaft Month ago

      Never catch me stepping foot on a Boeing

    • Asim Alharbi
      Asim Alharbi Month ago

      The 747 is the best of them all

  • donald trump
    donald trump Month ago

    👌👍👏

  • Murph88
    Murph88 2 months ago

    I hate this aircraft as it ushered in the demise of far more interesting and better looking widebody jets. It looks dull.

  • RobWillmot
    RobWillmot 2 months ago

    I like listening to this man.

  • JC Denton
    JC Denton 2 months ago

    Holy fuck those are big engines

  • Nick Banhidy
    Nick Banhidy 2 months ago

    Great video, Interesting to see all these new models. My biggest complaint is over the years the passenger seats are getting smaller and smaller. The seats pitch & legroom is always evaporating in the pursuit of cramming as many seats onto the aircraft as humanely possible. There should be industry minimums of legroom between the rows and seat pitch. I would even suggest minimum seat widths. However that's never going to be because Boeing will always promote their aircraft carrying 400-425-500 pax.

  • Rishen
    Rishen 2 months ago

    what is the name of the background soundtrack that starts at 1:00?

  • Mahbongass Smalls
    Mahbongass Smalls 2 months ago

    16:29 the plane was shot down by russian backed separatist in eastern Ukraine, also the situation around mh17 isn't complicated, don't let disinformation fool you

    • bboucharde
      bboucharde 2 months ago

      Smalls, That was a terrible loss, like when the US Navy shot down Iran Air Flight 655 on 3 July 1988, killing all 290 civilians on board. In contrast, the air space over Donbas was clearly marked as an active war zone, and other airlines were avoiding it.
      And, we have NEVER received transcripts and data from the Ukrainian air traffic system. Better think before you comment.

  • Marty Rumsfield
    Marty Rumsfield 2 months ago

    I like your videos. You give a fair assessment of aircraft, regardless of country of origin.

  • Chali Msupa
    Chali Msupa 2 months ago +3

    I used this in my flight from NRB to LAX in 2009... it was smooth all the way! the incident with 737 MAX is very unfortunate... :(

  • DJ Goggy
    DJ Goggy 2 months ago +1

    No it ain't AIRBUS IS

  • Gary Cobb
    Gary Cobb 2 months ago

    Looks like bowing are in a slump with the 737 as of to day 3 contres have band them over the latest crashes

  • Damalia Marsi
    Damalia Marsi 2 months ago

    The only thing about the 777 that I don't like is I can't afford to buy 10 of them :) Love the GE 90's, those things are engineering marvels.

  • jaja smile
    jaja smile 2 months ago

    Good job entertaining

  • Bobman84
    Bobman84 2 months ago +2

    What's the point of the 777 if the 787 (in multiple versions) and 797 coming are effectively the same in configuration etc? Seems a waste of money.

    • Bobman84
      Bobman84 Month ago +1

      +Will James I've done plenty of research, you have no valid counter-argument to seating arrangement specs...

    • Bobman84
      Bobman84 Month ago +1

      +Will James 777-200 (most common) has 313 in two-class. 787-10 has 330 in two-class. What more research is needed? How many 777s ever carry over 330 passengers?

    • Will James
      Will James Month ago

      Bobman84 do more research before commenting....777 is a lot bigger

  • terastarship2
    terastarship2 2 months ago

    They used to have weak engines some 20 years old ago but now they are wonderful perfect.

  • Gary Cobb
    Gary Cobb 2 months ago +1

    why is it that Bowing fans squak and rave about there aircraft when the fact is that there tec is 10 years behind Airbus its like compering a mustang to a Rolls Royce bowing are a hunk of junk comperd to Airbus the GE 90 and the RR Trent are so close that it makes no real difrence in performance

  • Jake Haynes
    Jake Haynes 2 months ago +2

    As great as the 777 is I would much rather fly on a 747 any day

  • Mahmut Akbaba
    Mahmut Akbaba 2 months ago +1

    Flew from Istanbul to NYC in a Turkish Airlines A330 and back in Turkish 777 (I think it was the 300ER version).
    Compared to its rival A330, the triple 7 is way roomier and more comfortable. Especially it's cabin design is a class of its own.
    Sad this bird has to give way to the Dreamliner, but that's business, that's life.

  • ATCkeepsUsafe
    ATCkeepsUsafe 2 months ago +2

    The production of the Airbus A380 will be missed. The rapid demised of the A380 is a complex tale of missed connections, changiing markets and ultimately, a staggering lack of demand for the largest commercial airplane ever built. And as, a result, this giant of the sky could very well be the last of its kind.

    • Aaron Lopez
      Aaron Lopez Day ago

      ATC well said, although I am Mdc, TriStar and 747 admirer the A380 will go down as a great engineering marvel with the worst timing
      and PR department. On the bright side we'll have them around as the most economical freighters ever.

  • Bobby Paluga
    Bobby Paluga 2 months ago

    The official report on the BA 777 that landed short at Heathrow.
    Whilst on approach to London (Heathrow) from Beijing, China, at 720 feet agl, the right engine of G-YMMM ceased responding to autothrottle commands for increased power and instead the power reduced to 1.03 Engine Pressure Ratio (EPR). Seven seconds later the left engine power reduced to 1.02 EPR. This reduction led to a loss of airspeed and the aircraft touching down some 330 m short of the paved surface of Runway 27L at London Heathrow. The investigation identi ed that the reduction in thrust was due to restricted fuel ow to both engines.
    It was determined that this restriction occurred on the right engine at its Fuel Oil Heat Exchanger (FOHE). For the left engine, the investigation concluded that the restriction most likely occurred at its FOHE. However, due to limitations in available recorded data, it was not possible totally to eliminate the possibility of a restriction elsewhere in the fuel system, although the testing and data mining activity carried out for this investigation suggested that this was very unlikely. Further, the likelihood of a separate restriction mechanism occurring within seven seconds of that for the right engine was determined to be very low.
    The investigation identi ed the following probable causal factors that led to the fuel ow restrictions:
    * 1) Accreted ice from within the fuel system1 released, causing a restriction to the engine fuel ow at the face of the FOHE, on both of the engines. 

    * 2) Ice had formed within the fuel system, from water that occurred naturally in the fuel, whilst the aircraft operated with low fuel ows over a long period and the localised fuel temperatures were in an area described as the ‘sticky range’. 

    3) The FOHE, although compliant with the applicable certi cation requirements, was shown to be susceptible to restriction when presented with soft ice in a high concentration, with a fuel temperature that is below -10°C and a fuel ow above ight idle.
    4) Certi cation requirements, with which the aircraft and engine fuel systems had to comply, did not take account of this phenomenon as the risk was unrecognised at that time.

  • Bobby Paluga
    Bobby Paluga 2 months ago

    Had the Concorde been in wide use, I might agree, there were just 12 in the liveries of Air France and British Air and during the majority of the Concorde's useful life neither airline made any money flying the aircraft. Up to 50% of the passengers were traveling on mileage awards. If you want to name the best airliner of the 20th century, you should consider the DC-3. It revolutionized passenger flight, it was also the most important workhorse of the war years. The Concorde was a wonderful aircraft but did it advance the the future of flight? NO We learned that supersonic flight is too expensive, burns too much fuel and the sonic boom issue kept it from flying over large landlocked countries. We already had incredibly fast supersonic aircraft before the Concorde used as spy planes and fighters.
    The Douglas DC-3 is a fixed-wingpropeller-driven airliner that revolutionized air transport in the 1930s and 1940s. Its lasting effect on the airline industry and World War II makes it one of the most significant transport aircraft ever produced. It has a cruise speed of 207 mph (333 km/h), capacity of 21 to 32 passengers or 6,000 lbs (2,700 kg) of cargo and a range of 1,500 mi (2,400 km).
    The DC-3 is a twin-engine metal monoplane with a tailwheel-type landing gear and was developed as a larger, improved 14-bed sleeper version of the Douglas DC-2. It had many exceptional qualities compared to previous aircraft. It was fast, had good range and could operate from short runways. It was reliable and easy to maintain and carried passengers in greater comfort. Before the war it pioneered many air travel routes. It could cross the continental United States and made worldwide flights possible. It is considered the first airliner that could profitably carry just passengers.
    Civil DC-3 production ended in 1942 at 607 aircraft. Military versions, including the C-47 Skytrain (designated the Dakota in British Royal Air Force (RAF) service), and Russian- and Japanese-built versions, brought total production to over 16,000. Following the war, the airliner market was flooded with surplus C-47s and other ex-military transport aircraft, and Douglas' attempts to produce an upgraded DC-3 failed due to cost.

  • John Crazy
    John Crazy 2 months ago

    the 777 flight record is over what you'd call amazing when you look at Stats!! flight hours, it owns ALL that have ever existed in terms of safety and revenue generating. that's why so many airlines all over the world BUY IT!!!

    • FreePadz
      FreePadz 2 months ago

      Its creaky uncomfortable and noisey. A380 is the best

  • نادر الی راحمان

    LOl @ all these ignorant people comparing the B777 to the Airbus 380. The Airbus 340 might be history but the Airbus 350 has replaced it and selling quite well. The Airbus 350 is the direct competitor to the Boeing 777.

  • Brian Crawford
    Brian Crawford 2 months ago

    I fly several times a year and have flown at least once a year since I've been about 5 and sadly have ever had the pleasure of flying on one 777. United from SFO to ord. Both of my 747 flights were also United. Plenty of 767 and down on a variety of airlines. Still remember the 727 and 737 originals we're I was in elementary. 727 was awesome. For Airbus I've only been on the A318, 319, and 320. Want to get the A321 and A350 and obviously 787 777x and eventual 797. Probably take my first E175 flight on Alaska in a few months on the FAT to SAN route

  • Pieter Roelofse
    Pieter Roelofse 2 months ago

    Excellent video with accurate information. Good job.

  • Stewart Campbell
    Stewart Campbell 2 months ago

    edified & entertained . Thank-You , YYZ , Mohawk-Planker

  • barracuda7018
    barracuda7018 2 months ago

    www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-28/british-air-is-said-to-favor-boeing-777x-to-replace-aging-jumbos

    Best of the best ...

  • Hamburgers G
    Hamburgers G 2 months ago

    he talks like his nose is pluged

  • Michael Brown
    Michael Brown 2 months ago

    They are all so similar in range and capacity, the distinctiveness of each model is lost on me.

  • Phillip Mulligan
    Phillip Mulligan 2 months ago +1

    love your accent. Sounds way better than any synthesized voice. Keep up the good work.

  • Rodrigo Godzinski
    Rodrigo Godzinski 2 months ago

    Vai q esbruga

  • Ristube
    Ristube 2 months ago

    The new Air Force One is a 747, there’s at least 2, but I’d guess 3.

  • When i became the sun..

    C-17 is better

  • TURKISH REICH
    TURKISH REICH 2 months ago +2

    I love the 777.I am so happy to go on a 777 ER this year on Turkish airlines. It's my dream to go on a 777.The 777 is my favorite plane and I'd prefer to fly on it. I'm coming back with a A330-300.

  • lightning9
    lightning9 2 months ago +2

    Everytime I see the 777, I think - 'look at the size of those freakin engines!'
    Everytime I see the A380, I think 'look at the size of those wings!'

  • Ahmad
    Ahmad 2 months ago +1

    I’m glad I found this channel. The videos on planes are well-researched and provide a lot of interesting information for laymen like me.
    - Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

  • Jean Macagnan
    Jean Macagnan 2 months ago

    Acho que é uns 400 milhões de dólares um um

  • Mike Henderson
    Mike Henderson 2 months ago

    I am a Boeing retiree. The 777 was my favorite project. Very proud of this airplane and it's safety record. Keep buying and flying Boeing! Keep those retirement checks coming! :-)

  • amadeusb4
    amadeusb4 3 months ago

    Well done. Now that the A380 is dead, I'm sure Boeing's plans have changes as well.

  • Louis Wiley
    Louis Wiley 3 months ago

    Flew on one in 2011 Chicago to So. Korea, quite an airplane. this was on Korean Airlines.

  • Libor Ocetek
    Libor Ocetek 3 months ago

    :) ;)

  • Maro Ugarkovic
    Maro Ugarkovic 3 months ago +1

    A350 XWB is the best by far!

    • Brian Crawford
      Brian Crawford 2 months ago

      I like the A350 but the 777x has no rival

  • Mickael Loe-A-Fook
    Mickael Loe-A-Fook 3 months ago +1

    I believe the better and most beautiful plane , is the " A 350 neo XWB carbon fiber " ! .

    • Mickael Loe-A-Fook
      Mickael Loe-A-Fook 2 months ago

      +Sam Lutfi , biiiiimp ! Wrong .

    • Sam Lutfi
      Sam Lutfi 2 months ago

      a plane this large didn't benefit by being composite. aluminum is not exactly heavy

  • SexAddict69
    SexAddict69 3 months ago +1

    If I could marry a machine, I would marry the 777 of Boeing Corp.

  • Tony Graham
    Tony Graham 3 months ago

    Borat? Lol

  • Snarge22
    Snarge22 3 months ago

    Regarding those 777x folding wingtips, they don't look very long until one realizes each on is actually 11 feet long, so not insubstantial. And I believe the engine nacelle diameter is larger than the fuselage of a 737. There certainly is some cool items with the 777.
    An interesting thought is with extend ranges of smaller airplanes like the 787 and even maybe future upgrades of a variety of airplanes with newer more fuel efficient engines, does that crowd in on the sales of larger airplanes? I think it does due to the ease and flexibility of filling and routing smaller airplanes.