The Collapsible Crash Test Robot Car

Share
Embed

Comments • 755

  • Tom Scott
    Tom Scott  3 months ago +723

    This was a lot of fun to film! Thanks to all the team: pull down the description for more about them.

    • T Duke Perry
      T Duke Perry 2 months ago

      +Awesome Aasim It's not used in lieu of crash tests - in fact it can't be used for crash tests! It's used for crash AVOIDANCE systems. No one would be stupid enough to use this thing for crash tests.

    • Awesome Aasim
      Awesome Aasim 2 months ago

      Watch as IIHS and NHTSA uses this instead of actual crash tests.

    • T Duke Perry
      T Duke Perry 3 months ago

      What you need for your motorcycle is that foam model so you could wear it as a cape! It'll be strapped to the top of your head like one of those umbrella hats.
      No but genuinely, these things are also looking out for pedestrians. I think a pedestrian clinging to a moving hunk of metal would be recognized just as easily.

    • T Duke Perry
      T Duke Perry 3 months ago

      I'm surprised you were so nervous. It was a foam model! I mean, if you did actually hit it at high speed, the car would go right through, so who cares!?

    • leftbak
      leftbak 3 months ago

      Tim Coggins looks like Upper Heyford Airfield

  • Ender Shard
    Ender Shard 17 days ago

    I wanna go in it then have it driven

  • RogerWilco
    RogerWilco Month ago

    This is brilliant.

  • MATAM
    MATAM Month ago

    WOB on licence plate = Wolfsburg, Germany

  • Thomas Busse
    Thomas Busse Month ago

    Sounds like a great way to assasinate people by hacking their car...oh wait, Michael hastings...

  • vulduv
    vulduv Month ago

    damnit volvo. 10 milliseconds late on the brakes! :P

  • jarry plundermen
    jarry plundermen 2 months ago

    Im from Germany and i can aproove

  • Male Sylveon
    Male Sylveon 2 months ago

    Why do you use MPH primarily instead of km/h? Use metric and/or SI units please. You can subtitle the MPH for the small remainder of the world that still uses the imperial system.

  • Myrmidon
    Myrmidon 2 months ago

    While the radar reflective foam is interesting I'm most fascinated by that little platform. It's almost flat but can travel at highway speeds and endure being constantly run over.

  • Ian dlV
    Ian dlV 2 months ago

    Another great video Tom but you could have done so much more at this fascinating facility.

  • Frits Spits
    Frits Spits 2 months ago

    As a biker, do they also test detection of motorcycles? I don't want the roads to be full of people trusting their car to prevent a collision and thus not paying attention to me. Nowadays I get overlooked/ignored on a regular basis already!

  • Matthew Eargle - AirborneSurfer

    That's actually a really clever idea!

  • Erik Lindgren
    Erik Lindgren 2 months ago

    the real question is , can you put a chair on the platform and drive around using a controller? imagine a lawnchair driving past you on the highway

  • Alex Landherr
    Alex Landherr 2 months ago

    That platform would be perfect in Robot Wars.

  • ShellShock794
    ShellShock794 3 months ago

    This video is really well done and put together but this company seems like they're full of crap.
    We don't see the target move and there is no way those velcroed pieces hold together while in motion, the car clearly fails the 40mph test, having a deliberately delayed/harsh brake is a fantastic way to give the driver no time to react and get rear ended.
    Nobody wants to admit it but automated cars are ridiculous and impractical. Not to mention no one wants them.

    • lewis waugh
      lewis waugh 2 months ago +1

      The platform has been in production for years and is used by the majority of OEMs and test centres around the world. Check out AB Dynamics TVclip page for loads of videos on it.

    • Tappits84
      Tappits84 2 months ago

      They were just saying the platform can move, but the tests they are going to do are not for 1-2 years yet and there test car, the volvo does not have the software to do it yet.. It's more of a soon ™ kind of thing.
      They were just showing they have made the destructible car thing that mimics a real car so they can test the new types of systems that are been developed and with it. it's quick and easy and cheap to do test after test.
      I don't think you understand how strong Quality industrial velcro is, More than enough to hold the car on the platform at 50mph
      As for the failed at 40mph, It's not meant to totally stop the car from hitting in any situation, hitting at 10mph is better than not having the system at all and hitting at 40mph.
      The test shown has nothing to do with automated cars and has to do with cruise control systems which have been a thing in cars since 1958
      Also i would love an automated car.

    • lewis waugh
      lewis waugh 2 months ago

      The platform will actually carry the softcar body on top up to 100kph. Search youtube for AB dynamics gst for proof ;-)

  • Anonymous User
    Anonymous User 3 months ago

    It failed at 40 mph? My Acura RDX Advanced does a better job than that...

  • Anonymous User
    Anonymous User 3 months ago

    Except it doesn't need to look just like a car. It also needs to test things that look like a motorcycle, or a bicycle, or a pedestrian, etc.

  • Superphilipp
    Superphilipp 3 months ago

    Why does it have a Wolfsburg registration?

  • Blasting Kyogre
    Blasting Kyogre 3 months ago

    0:35 did anyone else panic for no reason?

  • Mathieu Clement
    Mathieu Clement 3 months ago

    Except there are also motorbikes and bicycles on the road

  • Víktor Bautista i Roca

    Mph? Really? What about good old standard km/h

  • Lifes To Hack
    Lifes To Hack 3 months ago

    What happens if you are travelling at 220km per hour as the drivers in German Autobahn usually do? At 40 it hit the dummy, that means at higher speed it doesn't work?

    • Tappits84
      Tappits84 2 months ago

      Its not made to fix all problems, Most crashes are at less than 100kph were this system would help or avoid.

  • Marmite
    Marmite 3 months ago

    Clever! Good invention!

  • Jontheawsome92
    Jontheawsome92 3 months ago

    WHERE'S THE BANHAMMER

  • Skruttlund von Mögel
    Skruttlund von Mögel 3 months ago

    Where is that video you did with nerdcubed

  • billyyank
    billyyank 3 months ago

    I'm actually surprised that the experiment was not measured with metric units. Everything was in mph.

  • N English
    N English 3 months ago

    I see the future of the hoverboad.

  • Trevor Burford-Reade
    Trevor Burford-Reade 3 months ago

    Tom - I've watched many of your videos. it seems to me you're the 21st century James Burke.

  • Roman
    Roman 3 months ago

    Silly Tom, you're in the driver's seat, not the passenger

  • ian8354
    ian8354 3 months ago

    I want one of them foam cars! Build a wood under chassis with a push bike incorporated....
    cars would give me room then as i pedal along, whilst they overtake me......

  • Michael
    Michael 3 months ago

    Wanted to see one of them foam cars get hit.



    Got my wish.

  • Jesus Portillo
    Jesus Portillo 3 months ago

    But it crashed though

    • Tappits84
      Tappits84 2 months ago

      It hit at like 5-10 mph which is much better than hitting at the full 40mph... thats what its ment to do.

  • Pixie Panda Plush
    Pixie Panda Plush 3 months ago +1

    This is what I've said for years. A computer can easily calculate and compare speeds, and determine acceleration and figure out when two items at different speeds and accelerations will collide. - It's about inserting these values into the computer correctly. - With these values, the car can then make sure you always have enough space to break before hitting the car in front, and if the car in front slows down, so will yours. (2:30) The car needs to detect that the item ahead isn't moving, and slow down your car much earlier for a safter stopping distance. It can be slippery too, and it should also be comfortable. (2:55) It doesn't need to understand that it is a car; it is huge and it is blocking the way. So would this car just run straight into a container because it isn't a car? (3:05) It doesn't have to alert the driver that it is braking; or at least not with sound. It can have an indicator that it is auto-braking, just like it has ABS and TCS indicators.
    There's no reason to turn this system off, but if needed, there can be an override; examples are if you are overtaking and don't want it to slow down by the car you're going to overtake, and if you're pulling out of a queue and the car thinks you're going to get to close to the car ahead. - As self driving cars is the future, the goal is to make these assistive features take over your car. - It will slow down when needed, it will keep inside the lines, it will park for you, and it can read signs, and it has a GPS, and so on.

  • Chad Kensington
    Chad Kensington 3 months ago +1

    1v1 wwe 2k15 hell in cell PS4 plez

  • david13579naranja
    david13579naranja 3 months ago

    My car's cruise control shuts off if it goes below 29 mph. Doesnt really matter since I never use cruise control anyway. It is not a comfortable feeling (especially for my foot) having the car accelerate itself.

  • geekskates
    geekskates 3 months ago

    As a motorcyclist, this tech and the developing driver reliance upon it scares me. You wouldn't consider the second test that impacted the stationery vehicle to have worked if you were on a bike. People are already far too complacent when driving, checking their phones and not taking it seriously, believing an airbag will save them if it all goes pear shaped. Get rid of it all and provide good driver training and a Tullock spike in every vehicle.

    • Tappits84
      Tappits84 2 months ago

      Its not a driver reliance system. Its a system that makes using cruise control safer. Normal CC systems will just drive right in the back if the driver is not paying attention, were as this system will make CC safer by slowing or stopping you totaly. Most people dont use CC so makes no differance.

  • T4iga
    T4iga 3 months ago

    This is very importnat moving forward and very interesting indeed. Thanks for sharing, Tom.

  • épinards & caramel
    épinards & caramel 3 months ago

    That looks fun :)
    (if you could include speeds in km/h as well that would be perfect)

  • Klaus Gartenstiel
    Klaus Gartenstiel 3 months ago

    sign it up for the next spy movie.

  • Jake Terrell
    Jake Terrell 3 months ago

    I feel like this video was cut short. I doubt you went all the way out there to do two brake tests...where is the rest?

    • Tappits84
      Tappits84 2 months ago

      Maybe they were there all day doing the same 2 tests over and over with different groups of people

  • Sujay Patel
    Sujay Patel 3 months ago

    This was filmed in the town I live in, crazy

  • Isaac Walker
    Isaac Walker 3 months ago +4

    Or, hear me out, we could just drive cars and while *gasp* paying attention to the road and traffic somehow not colliding by using these revolutionary inventions called a "Brake Pedal". technology is going too far

    • Billy Bob
      Billy Bob 3 months ago

      We could, but what about people with disabilities that make it difficult or just impossible to drive cars? Or what about the fact that car crashes kill millions a year, most caused by human error, simply because humans don't have instant reaction time and the ability to see all around us all the time.

    • iamthinking2202 _
      iamthinking2202 _ 3 months ago +1

      Mm, and why not remove airbags too - their bad if they didn't react fast enough /s

  • JonnTheOne
    JonnTheOne 3 months ago

    "Brake late because otherwise it will just annoy the drivers". What about countries up here in the north that occasionally have snow or ice on the road. I hope they put that up for a discussion, cause these break tests would have ended badly on slightly worse road conditions than we saw here.

    • Tappits84
      Tappits84 2 months ago

      You would not normaly be sat with CC on when its snowing would you?

  • Rob Jeffrey
    Rob Jeffrey 3 months ago

    Shame we didn't get to see the robot platform on the move

  • Liam Waldie
    Liam Waldie 3 months ago

    This wasn't wasn't on my subscription feed. Grrr

  • RPNScott
    RPNScott 3 months ago

    I know teslas have a mechanism for seeing two cars ahead by bouncing radar under the car in front of you. Wouldn't having the test target on a base with so little ground clearance give inaccurate readings with a system that expects a gap at road level?

    • lewis waugh
      lewis waugh 3 months ago

      The base is only 100mm high and the target has radar absorbing lower edges which offers minimal radar reflection, although I've not come across a sensor that looks under cars for further traffic.

  • Joel Getz
    Joel Getz 3 months ago

    I may have enjoyed that car getting hit a little too much.

  • Cinalaya
    Cinalaya 3 months ago

    All this automation crap, just drive properly or get on the train.

    • Oskar Skog
      Oskar Skog 3 months ago

      In cities, that would be at a snails pace because there are potential idiots and children everywhere. Anything could come out from anywhere at any time.

  • Harriet de Kok
    Harriet de Kok 3 months ago

    Aw I wanted Tom to be in the driving car when they smashed into the dummy car

  • dangerousmythbuster
    dangerousmythbuster 3 months ago +1

    I want to see it try emergency braking at 80MPH.

  • Yukuru Wusky
    Yukuru Wusky 3 months ago

    I'd love to see more of self driving action. is there test footage?

  • ROVER25X
    ROVER25X 3 months ago

    I recognise the older Thatcham guy.

  • whydoievenbothertoputthishere

    What a gizmo...

  • Michael Glass
    Michael Glass 3 months ago

    Did the Hazard lights automatically come on when the car was rear ended?

    • Tappits84
      Tappits84 2 months ago

      Almost all cars with flash hazards light if you slam on your brakes now to warn the people behind.

  • Joe Brown
    Joe Brown 3 months ago

    There's an interesting shutter sync artefact at 2:29. Every five frames the alloy wheel "spokes" (which are otherwise in sync with the frame rate) jump, suggesting there's a slightly longer or shorter interval after every fifth frame, than otherwise. What camera was used for that segment?

  • Nighthawk
    Nighthawk 3 months ago

    what happens if you're going down the country road at 70mph, with no human seen in miles, and suddenly there's a car broken down in the literal middle of the road.....?
    your feet at tired, you can't respond in time, much less at that speed.
    bam! I just broke your system.

    .....and, the car, and, the driver, if that was a real situation.

  • Doc Holliday
    Doc Holliday 3 months ago +2

    I don't know why one would ever use cruise control around other cars. I only ever use cruise control on long stretches of mostly empty road.

  • azalru
    azalru 3 months ago

    Tesla autopilot is so much better than volvos.

    • Tappits84
      Tappits84 2 months ago

      Thats cool because volvo does not have an autopilot system.

  • Falc1NL
    Falc1NL 3 months ago +1

    Imagine the people setting the car back together as if its an Ikea thing, and then they have two parts still laying around when its done.

  • David Buschhorn
    David Buschhorn 3 months ago

    I used to drive a delivery truck on Fridays. It was about 700 miles of almost all highway driving. It was incredible what your brain wouldn't let you see! There'd be stopped traffic on the freeway and you would almost never be aware of it until it was really close. Like the distance where you realize you need to change lanes to get around a slower car.
    One stopped car in the middle of the road and cars would only hit their brakes at the last second. After that, the huge crash caught other driver's eyes and they'd slow down in time, but until then, that car in the middle of the road was definitely going to get hit. :-(

  • Michael K
    Michael K 3 months ago

    What happens with such braking assistants if friction is worse due to rain, gravel etc.? The braking distance can easily be twice as high.

    • Oskar Skog
      Oskar Skog 3 months ago

      You don't. You can measure the friction when the wheel start locking or spinning, which may have happened already. Otherwise, you estimate the friction.

    • Michael K
      Michael K 3 months ago

      Oskar Skog How do you measure friction without applying a force i.e. accelerating (either positive or negative acceleration)?

    • Oskar Skog
      Oskar Skog 3 months ago

      They have to take measurements long before they even warn the driver.

    • Michael K
      Michael K 3 months ago

      Rob Fraser But how would they know about the friction before the brakes are applied? Or is the short brake pulse to wake up the driver used to get an estimate?

    • Rob Fraser
      Rob Fraser 3 months ago

      The onboard computers do some maths and compensate...

  • Scott Cariss
    Scott Cariss 3 months ago

    Which car disables adaptive cruise control at 20mph or under? Would want to "steer clear" of that car when coming to buy my next car. The next car I want, I want it to come with ACC and an automatic gearbox that can ACC to a standstill to help in stop-start traffic.

    • Oskar Skog
      Oskar Skog 3 months ago

      Or maybe you could learn to drive instead?

  • Arnold vd M
    Arnold vd M 3 months ago

    Does anybody understand why the license plate is: WOB ZK 295 ?
    Wolfsburg?

    • Rob Fraser
      Rob Fraser 3 months ago

      Because that is the plate they chose...

  • etbadaboum
    etbadaboum 3 months ago +2

    The flying carpet is real! Want. ...Tesla? Please!

  • enoughofyourkoicarp
    enoughofyourkoicarp 3 months ago

    Bowling with cars, the inexpensive version.

  • K0nst4nt1n96
    K0nst4nt1n96 3 months ago

    What about Bikes? does the system work with bikes? its not like there are only cars on the road.

  • onkar phall
    onkar phall 3 months ago

    They should do the test with cheap tyres I'm sure the car will stop with premium tyres what about low end budget tyres would it stop in time.

    • Tappits84
      Tappits84 2 months ago

      Its not ment to stop all the time, Its depends how fast you are going, also if you can afford the 35k for the car with this on it you can afford the 200 a tyre

  • Motorman2112
    Motorman2112 3 months ago

    It'll be interesting to see what happens when someone builds a jamming pod to create false radar targets...

    • Rob Fraser
      Rob Fraser 3 months ago

      I imagine cars will have redundancy's, Volkswagen are developing radar while Google and Tesla both use cameras and AI but I reckon best practice policy will see all autonomous cars one day using every feature that is available to them in exactly the same way we see cars using both seatbelts and airbags instead of choosing one or the other.

  • Papa Musk
    Papa Musk 3 months ago

    For a moment i thought the guy in the thumbnail preview was Scott Manley

  • Jeff Session
    Jeff Session 3 months ago

    meanwhile we test in video games 24hours a day

  • MagicSkeleton
    MagicSkeleton 3 months ago

    This is all very encouraging. What could be great is if cameras/radar were installed on light poles, watching all the pedestrians (not recording or identifying anybody). Then AI would be calculating probabilities based on movement and speed whether someone was about to walk or run onto the road. All cars could be required to constantly interact with this AI, so that if, say, a child was running around erratically on a pavement, the AI could judge there was a 70% chance he could run into the road, and, based on his distance to the road, your cars' distance to him (plus speed), could prime the cars' brakes and steering.

    • MagicSkeleton
      MagicSkeleton 3 months ago

      No, that's not what I'm proposing. I'm proposing sensors or cameras on every lamp post, all connected to a central AI controller. It's not surveillance, which I made clear in my original comment. There would be no recording or ID'ing of people. Just movement prediction to prepare cars for evasive action. The car and driver would be ultimately responsible for what happened, but the AI would prime the car if it deemed a certainly probability of danger. And it would be worth all the money thrown at it if it would save lives.

    • KohuGaly
      KohuGaly 3 months ago

      The real question is, where should the money be spend for best effect on lives saved. What you are proposing is a large-scale integrated surveillance system - such things are ridiculously expensive. On order of magnitude they are similar to establishing no-driving zones and public transport to them, which would eliminate 100% of car-pedestrian encounters.

    • MagicSkeleton
      MagicSkeleton 3 months ago

      Of course the driver should be aware, but pedestrians are still killed all the time (whether it's their fault or the driver's). The point is obvious: investing in AI infrastructure will give superior protection to pedestrians, and save hundreds if not thousands of lives.

    • KohuGaly
      KohuGaly 3 months ago

      interesting, but a bit of an overkill with high maintenance cost. The driver should already be aware of pedestrians at or near the road and estimate (the uncertainty of) their motion. Putting warning road signs in critical areas and making road and pavement more visible solves 99% of problems with just a chainsaw, pole, metal sheet and bucket of paint. And you can spend the money you saved elsewhere for better effect.

  • CKOD
    CKOD 3 months ago +2

    super thin platform with ramps, can drive 50 mph, and hold the weight of a car on top... Sounds like some battlebots guys got a more formal job.

    • lewis waugh
      lewis waugh 3 months ago

      Haha you should see our fully driverless systems ;-)

  • Aalbert Torsius
    Aalbert Torsius 3 months ago

    35 mph is about 56 km/h
    40 mph is about 64 km/h

  • Detective_panda
    Detective_panda 3 months ago

    Loved the video very interesting

  • izbug J
    izbug J 3 months ago

    I'm always curious with Britians whole parking on the side of the road thing how we'll get around that. My mum has a car with automatic headlights that senses cars but it always senses ones on the side of the road that are parked as well

  • Sarah Vittrup
    Sarah Vittrup 3 months ago

    that is so smart! lovely to see some people working hard to make trafic safer! :D

  • n40798
    n40798 3 months ago

    Does it need to be like a puzzle that takes 15 minutes to assemble? Why cant the radar material simply be held in shape with a thin and light but somewhat firm wire frame? It will stay intact after the impact and can quickly be placed back on top of that robot platform

  • SecretRaginMan
    SecretRaginMan 3 months ago +2

    Wait. You said you were getting in the passenger seat and then sat in the driver's . . . Oh, right. Limeys. You drive on the wrong side of the car and the road but we still love you. :P

  • b1aflatoxin
    b1aflatoxin 3 months ago

    Good share. Thanks!

  • MsSomeonenew
    MsSomeonenew 3 months ago

    There are even now a lot of lane assist systems that will just turn off without the slightest warning, even Jaguar I-Pace does this crap.
    They are far more dangerous giving you the idea that the car will handle steering then never having it at all.

  • bartonez123
    bartonez123 3 months ago

    Does it work if you are driving through a corner when you come across the obstacle?

  • Dr Logiq
    Dr Logiq 3 months ago

    But the thing is, these drivers know they're heading towards a stationary target... what they need is to put someone in that car who has no idea what they're in for and see if THEY can react in time

  • Tom
    Tom 3 months ago

    Looking at how French people drive in general, I bet they need to pull the auto stop system's fuse on their new carsk. Safety distance? Who needs that fancy crap, blinkers?? Same for the Autobahn heroes who think 50cm is a good distance when they fly into traffic at >180km/h.

  • Moist Choice
    Moist Choice 3 months ago +1

    It would be a great prank to drive into and give your passanger a heart attack

  • mdem
    mdem 3 months ago

    Great video!
    Would have loved to see a crash from the inside thogh, haha

  • dalton skids
    dalton skids 3 months ago

    well you see vehicles, they vehicle and vehicle vehicle. so we try to vehicle with a vehicle to the vehicle.

  • Y2Kvids
    Y2Kvids 3 months ago

    Looks inspired from the World war decoy tanks.

  • J.R. Smith
    J.R. Smith 3 months ago

    Use metric! kph

  • Jock McBile
    Jock McBile 3 months ago

    VERY COOL

  • David Logan
    David Logan 3 months ago +1

    Does the system compensate for weather?

  • Dante Wolf
    Dante Wolf 3 months ago +1

    In the future all cars will be driverless, and thus there will be less need for automatic radar breaks becasue the car in front of your car will just say "hey i'm going to stop how" and your car will go "okay, i'll adjust accordingly" for non car related accidents it will be useful though.

    • Rob Fraser
      Rob Fraser 3 months ago +1

      That would be wireless cars, not driverless. That tech would be perfect for today as your car would communicate with the one behind much quicker than the driver in that car picking up on your brakelights.

  • Evan Magill
    Evan Magill 3 months ago +1

    2:27, why do the wheels look so weird? They look like, their toggling between two states or like they were recorded at an extremely low frame rate but everything else looks normal.

    • Rob Fraser
      Rob Fraser 3 months ago +2

      Anything that moves fast enough will always look as though it's being caught in different states when recorded, that is how frames work. Never seen a helicopter on film?

  • JumpyWun
    JumpyWun 3 months ago

    Why did you say in Miles per hour? You’re English for ducks sake

  • Chameleon Scheimong
    Chameleon Scheimong 3 months ago +1

    I would like to have seen more details about that robot. It's quite amazing how they can manage to pack something that goes so fast into something so slim, meanwhile also keeping it durable enough to be run over by cars at highway speeds.

  • Ace Edmonds
    Ace Edmonds 3 months ago

    That 's one way to keep your interns busy...

  • Sanity016
    Sanity016 3 months ago

    I'm glad there are people concered with testing the safety equipment and keeping driver annoyance in mind.

  • Tman Utube
    Tman Utube 3 months ago

    This is brilliant, thanks.

  • eWizard
    eWizard 3 months ago +56

    >50mph
    >"highway speeds"
    Disgusting, Tom Scott. Truly filthy.

    • eWizard
      eWizard 3 months ago

      +Pixie Panda Plush I believe he's in England for this video.

    • Pixie Panda Plush
      Pixie Panda Plush 3 months ago +3

      Motorways in Sweden are 80 to 120 km/h (50 to 75 mph), so it's the lower bound.

  • Abbrahan
    Abbrahan 3 months ago

    Take a shot every time the word 'vehicle' is used in this video.

  • Account Abandoned
    Account Abandoned 3 months ago

    So what if the system glitches and forces you onto the brakes when going highway speeds? You'd better hope the car behind you has a functioning, non-glitching version of that same system.